Endorsed by

Risk 2015: Risk and normative architecture

In preparation of the 2015 National Architecture Conference - Risk, Marc Angélil discusses risk and normative architecture.

From the perspective of the insurance industry, risk is a construct with both a real component and an imaginary component. The real component pertains to the question of when a catastrophic event may or may not occur in a real setting. The imaginary component pertains to whether this catastrophic event is psychologically driven, putting you in a situation where you anticipate or fear a real risk that might never occur. From this vantage point, it is important that the degree of imaginary risk is as high as possible, while the degree of real risk is as low as possible. It’s in this way that insurance companies increase their profits.

This is a principle of risk developed out of economics and mathematics that used to have very little importance to the discipline of architecture and urban design. A few decades ago the discipline of architecture was about form, composition and ground floor plans. Today, suddenly risk has become an important phenomenon that we have to face in our discipline.

Risk entered the field of architecture through managerial techniques that have been introduced into everything that we do – in the office and on the construction site. In the process, it has fundamentally changed the nature of the discipline. I would argue that several decades ago we were more willing to take risks – to explore, do research and accept the fact that one might fail. Failure, if recognized, contributes to the advancement of knowledge.

However, with risk now at the forefront, people in the architectural atelier tend to minimize risk irrespective of whether the risk is real or imaginary. This promotes normative responses to certain problems.

The guarantee of a certain result or a certain performance of a structure relates to what you already know, which through managerial techniques leads to a certain banality of architecture. Whatever you do, you know the outcome. You enter a time when solutions are given and architecture becomes static and predictable.



Published online: 30 Apr 2015
Words: Marc Angélil
Images: Courtesy of The Holcim Foundation.


Architecture Australia, March 2015

Related topics

More discourse

See all
Research in large practice

Naomi Stead and Sandra Kaji O’Grady introduce their guest-edited dossier for Architecture Australia, which looks at the state of research in large architecture practices in …

Arrested development

Peter Raisbeck argues that the lack of formalized research and development in Australian architecture practice is stymieing innovation.

A British perspective on practice-based architectural research

Murray Fraser, vice-dean of research at the Bartlett School of Architecture and as chair of the Research and Innovation Group at RIBA, explores practice-based research.

Research in large Australian practices: A roundtable discussion

A frank and revealing discussion about how and why large Australian practices organize and fund research, and how they disseminate its findings.