Brain and Mind Research Institute

Walls of glass promise a refreshing transparency in the laboratories and consulting rooms of BVN Architecture’s new facility at the University of Sydney.

Doctors have surgeries; psychiatrists have rooms. When we think of a psychiatrist’s room, we tend to think of a place of calm luxury, of couches and cushions, a view of the garden and small, beautiful objects tastefully arranged on the mantelpiece. It is a soothing image, a popular dream.

Laboratories occupy the top two floors. Diffused light from the floor-to-ceiling glass walls illuminates the working areas.

Laboratories occupy the top two floors. Diffused light from the floor-to-ceiling glass walls illuminates the working areas.

Image: John Gollings

“That’s a 1940s image of mental illness,” says Dr Ian Hickie. As professor at the newly completed Brain and Mind Research Institute (BMRI) at the University of Sydney, Dr Hickie has other ideas as to what rooms are needed for the treatment of mental illness. Designed by James Grose of BVN Architecture, the building is part research centre, part clinic. Grose credits Professor Hickie and Professor Max Bennett as the true authors of this building. Their brief to the architect was twofold: first, a centre for the study of the brain, Professor Bennett’s domain of neurophysiology; and second, a centre for the study of the mind, Professor Hickie’s field of psychiatry. Professor Bennett runs the two top floors as research laboratories, and Professor Hickie the first two floors from the street up as a youth access centre and clinical consulting rooms.

As a passionate advocate for early intervention in mental health issues, Hickie sees these community rooms and bulk-billing clinical facilities as a chance to catch mental disease early, before serious deterioration sets in. To achieve this, their plan was for an open place – an open door to the street and open access for patients, families, psychiatrists, students and scientists to exchange ideas. “On entering, though,” says Hickie, “we leave our labels at the front door.”

A palette of timber, glass and steel is used both inside and out. The institute’s public spaces are open and accessible.

A palette of timber, glass and steel is used both inside and out. The institute’s public spaces are open and accessible.

Image: John Gollings

From the street, the building is dramatic. With a palette of glass, timber and steel, the new structure appears to hover weightlessly above the existing two-storey heritage brick facade. The program within is made transparently available to the street. The distinction between clinic and laboratories is clear, literally, with the laboratories sheathed in pure glass – untrammelled structural planks of glass articulated with a subtle pattern of varying translucencies that catch the shifting light. This is one of those rare instances where a very difficult architectural idea is pulled off with complete assurance. It’s a pity it’s a narrow street – this is so good, you want to stand back and just gasp.

A four-storey “vertical street” at the northern end of the building is a lively space with timber screens and steel stairs.

A four-storey “vertical street” at the northern end of the building is a lively space with timber screens and steel stairs.

Image: John Gollings

As counterpoint to this shimmering horizontal stands a four-storey-high box beam of steel, marking the entrance. Within this entrance is the “vertical street,” as Grose describes it, set back from the adjacent northern building to allow for sunshine, a garden and air. This vertical street is a lively space: four storeys of timber screens and steel stairs with a glazed northern aspect, connecting every space in this building and the adjacent laboratory buildings via bridges. Hickie sees this space as the most important in the building. “The worst thing in the world is a lift,” he says. “They kill communication. Communication happens in stairwells.” It is a warm and welcoming space, and would be filled with sunlight in winter. There is a kitchen and a big table on the first landing, right in the heart of the building. It’s a clever plan, and a very generous and singular public gesture.

The ascent of these stairs culminates in the laboratories on the top two floors. Here we find the very opposite of the ivory tower. They are open in plan, fully visible to the public, and beautifully lit by the floor-to-ceiling glass walls which pour diffuse light deep into the space. These laboratories have an ethereal quality, an almost religious feel to them. They are utterly functional, but there is a poetic quality in their light and placement at the summit of the grand stair that says a lot about the role of science for professors Hickie and Bennett in the treatment of mental health.

Transparency reigns supreme in this building. This is entirely appropriate to a scientific facility, particularly one with such an ambitious and democratic social agenda. The internal program is transparent to the street outside, the open floor plans are transparent to the “vertical street,” and the external new walls are transparent both to the street and, for the most part, within. Even the patient consulting rooms, arranged as office cubicles, have glass walls – translucent glass, but glass nonetheless. One wonders how an intimate conversation could unfold in such a space; we’re a long way from cosy cushioned consulting rooms here. This transparency is particularly remarkable when seen within the context of the history of public buildings dedicated to the treatment of the mentally ill, commonly called asylums.

The view south along the institute’s Church Street frontage. The steel box beam at the right houses the entry and “vertical street.”

The view south along the institute’s Church Street frontage. The steel box beam at the right houses the entry and “vertical street.”

Image: John Gollings

The word asylum is interesting here, with its apparently contradictory meanings of both “madhouse” and “sanctuary.” Take Bedlam, the original asylum in London: the mad, as they were then called, were taken from the streets and housed under lock and key. Bedlam was the original madhouse, a cuckoo’s nest, and over time became a popular tourist attraction. Under the public gaze, a stigma attached itself to the mentally ill. The godless, immoral city life was seen as the cause of madness. The asylum became a prison for the wicked.

The later Kirkbride asylum model sought to counter this with a program of “moral treatment.” Sunlight, fresh air and gardens would provide the cure. This medical philosophy became known as “building-as-cure.” These asylums were laid out as long wings of private rooms with tall windows, set within walled gardens – true sanctuaries. It was, however, a utopian plan, and the accountants started asking questions. Cuts were made and, by the 1980s in Australia, the most severely mentally ill were in dispersed and inadequate care, in prison, or back on the street.

The BMRI is, in its own way, a new kind of “building-as-cure.” Moral judgments have been shelved in the name of science. The clinical rooms for patients are functional and spare – they say biology, medicine and cure. We are at a far remove from the asylum rooms of Bedlam and Kirkbride, the closed Freudian rooms of cushions and couches, dedicated to the unravelling of a narrative of self. All is clear in the light of a knowing science.

Rooms take new shapes for new dreams.


BVN Donovan Hill
Project Team
James Grose, Sarita Chand, Ian Goodbury, Nicola Bertrand, Kate Smith, Andrea Fink, Alexander Suen
Acoustic engineer Acoustic Studio
Building advice Cockram Construction
Building regulations consultant Steve Watson & Partners
Construction manager Buildcorp Interiors
Cost consultant Davis Langdon
Fire engineering Rawfire
Heritage consultant Godden Mackay Logan
Imaging equipment Siemens
Landscape consultant Sue Barnsley Design
Planning consultant City Plan
Project manager APP Corporation
Quantity surveyor Page Kirkland Partnership
Structural consultant Aurecon
Structural, traffic, electrical, hydraulic and mechanical engineer Arup Sydney
Site details
Location 100 Mallett Street,  Camperdown,  Sydney,  NSW,  Australia
Site type Suburban
Category Commercial / public buildings
Type Commercial
Project Details
Status Built
Client The Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney.



Published online: 31 Oct 2011
Words: Ian Martin
Images: John Gollings


Architecture Australia, March 2011

Related topics

More projects

See all
From the spiral stairs to elongated voids, each element is integral to the home’s functionality and the design intent. Elastic geometry: Glebe House

Crafted with deference to the sculptural potential of architecture, this compact family home by Chenchow Little with “elastic” geometry is a lesson in tectonic editing.

The upper level of the bridge has been converted into green space, with snaking beds of plants. Fixed binoculars give visitors the opportunity to look out onto busy Lonsdale Street. Pattern is king: Melbourne Central Arcade

Melbourne architecture practice Kennedy Nolan has revitalized the public arcades of Melbourne Central, strengthening the centre’s character and heightening the user experience.

Colour has been used to differentiate the spaces and to elevate the interiors through playful but complementary colour schemes. Flying colours: Giraffe Early Learning Centre

In Sydney’s Northern Beaches, architecture studio Supercontext has restored and reused a heritage substation, converting it into a place for children to play and learn.

Each of Arc’s four facades matches the height and rhythm of neighbouring elevations, showing deference to its context. Tall towers amid brick warehouses: Arc

Demonstrating careful consideration of its heritage surrounds and with a mix of uses throughout, this finely detailed skyscraper by Koichi Takada Architects advances the social …

Most read

Latest on site