Demolition

In praise of minor modernism farewell, fitzroy gardens toilets

This is an article from the Architecture Australia archives and may use outdated formatting

PHOTOGRAPHY PETER JOHNS

The floating
dished roof of the 1950s
toilet block that nestled
among the trees of
Fitzroy Gardens.

The floating dished roof of the 1950s toilet block that nestled among the trees of Fitzroy Gardens.

A Wolfgang Sievers
photograph of the
building soon after
completion in 1957.

A Wolfgang Sievers photograph of the building soon after completion in 1957.

The toilets in 2005.

The toilets in 2005.

Demolition.
The mid-century gem
will be replaced with
faux Victorian
self-cleaning structures
on the gardens’ edge.

Demolition. The mid-century gem will be replaced with faux Victorian self-cleaning structures on the gardens’ edge.

Small mid-century works of public architecture are under continual threat. Peter Johns charts the unexpected demolition of the strikingly elegant Fitzroy Gardens Toilets, a victim of council anxiety.Melburnians strolling to work through the Fitzroy Gardens on the morning of 20 February may have noticed orange barricading around a 1950s toilet pavilion notable for its dished concrete roof. The roof hovered daringly above part-height walls, and was supported only by a tapered central column. These loos were designed by the city architect’s office and were built in 1957, a year after Melbourne’s Olympics.

The current office advises that it was probably Alex Pederson at the end of the pencil. Contractors at the building said that it was to be bowled any minute, “for the Commonwealth Games”.

A few emails later and a group gathered with their lunches to watch pipes being stopped and sealed, and to wonder how this important little building fell through the gaps – surely it was all a mistake. But the City of Melbourne issued a press release at 6.15 PM:

“For a number of years, the male toilets in the Fitzroy Gardens have been the subject of complaints about offensive and intimidating behaviour from individuals who chose to linger there … [We] made the decision to remove and replace the toilets to improve safety in the gardens for the many visitors and residents who use the gardens … Their removal is in line with the City of Melbourne’s policy on the location of toilets. Under this policy, toilets should be located on an ‘activity frontage’, such as near roads and entrances.” – Councillor Fraser Brindley.

At 7.30 AM the following morning, up to twenty people gathered to watch the demolition, which had started a while before. The contractors complained that it was taking longer than expected – one look at the amount of reinforcing in the roof explained why. The ceremony/funeral ended an hour later with speeches and photos in front of the rubble, and then we shuffled off to work.

The council has a policy of closing public toilets in shady parts of town and replacing them with faux Victorian self-cleaning loos.

It also has a policy of removing buildings from gardens whenever possible. Heritage Victoria had failed to see the building’s worth, so it was deemed removable.

Community consultation was apparently “normal”, but seems to have been limited to asking for thoughts from the East Melbourne Group (the local Save Our Suburbs), the National Trust, and Heritage Victoria.

No-one else seemed to know about it.

Within a few days of the demolition the site had been grassed – nothing remained other than a couple of crazy-paved planters and a flat area where the pavilion once stood. Nearby is a new sign saying that the toilets would be closing in a few days. Was this the public consultation?

Life won’t become too sanitized in the gardens now that the loos are gone. The beat will move, hopefully prompting future demolitions of nearby Cook’s Cottage (1933), and those other bastions of twee, The Faerie Tree and Model Village. But no, they’re all registered. These listed twentieth-century structures appear to have ensured their longevity by looking a lot older than their years.

Mid-century modernist toilets, changing sheds, substations and bus shelters should be considered endangered. Love them or lose them – at least take a photo when you see a good example, as it may be the only record. New requirements for accessibility and worker safety have made many of these buildings obsolete. An anxious council’s fear of “loiterers” has seen this loo off and others will follow. City bureaucrats with a preference for lacework over breezeblock don’t help matters either.

“Whilst Council appreciates your views on the value of the actual toilet building it is considered that removal of the toilets and installation of new facilities will be of greater overall benefit to the Gardens and the community.” – Ian Harris, Group Manager Parks and Recreation. PETER JOHNS IS A DIRECTOR OF ANTARCTICA AND RUNS THE BUTTERPAPER WEBSITE.

Source

Archive

Published online: 1 May 2006

Issue

Architecture Australia, May 2006

More archive

See all
The November 2020 issue of Landscape Architecture Australia. November issue of LAA out now

A preview of the November 2020 issue of Landscape Architecture Australia.

The May 2021 issue of Landscape Architecture Australia. May issue of LAA out now

A preview of the May 2021 issue of Landscape Architecture Australia.

Most read

Latest on site

LATEST PRODUCTS