Endorsed by

Risk 2015: Risk and values

In preparation of the 2015 National Architecture Conference - Risk, Rahul Mehrotra discusses the nuances of risk.

The temporal dimension is very important in order to calibrate the nature of risk. Just as climate change encompasses both slow disasters and quick disasters, so too a career can be wrecked by one building collapse or by the slow erosion of a reputation due to poor work over time.

At the dimension of scale, it is important to consider whether a risk is borne by you alone, or across a community. As an architect, you can egoistically assume all the authorship, but then you also shoulder all the risk. When you become more collaborative, you are also spreading risk. Community building, which is the approach that is very important in my work, is all about spreading risk in a positive sense.

In either case, the question of risk becomes more nuanced when related to values. The moment you nuance your understanding of risk and calibrate it differently, in relation to value judgements, collective endeavour and the temporal scale, it takes on a greater degree of complexity. This then presents positive possibilities, where risks can lead to gains.

In the realm of architecture teaching, which I have been involved in for some time, I realize that the question of risk has also changed radically. The use of interface technology and design processes in education has changed dramatically, and one of its outcomes is that students are becoming less committed.

In one respect students are taking risks, but the consequences of the risks are diminished. As a simple example, when I used to draw by hand using rulers and French curves, changing the design was not a quick task. Every commitment meant a greater risk. With today’s technology, every move is much more reversible and therefore much less of a risk. That has a massive bearing. I would argue that these new technologies allow greater explorations, but at some expense to commitment and to the rewards of risk.



Published online: 30 Apr 2015
Words: Rahul Mehrotra
Images: Courtesy of The Holcim Foundation


Architecture Australia, March 2015

Related topics

More discourse

See all
The amphitheatre and plaza in Hassell and Herzog & de Meuron’s competition-winning scheme for Flinders Street Station, Melbourne (2013). No funding for the project had been secured by the Victorian government at the time of the competition. Regaining a competitive edge

The proliferation of architectural design competitions risks devaluing the real merits of a fair and well-ordered process. Michael Keniger surveys a suite of initiatives.

Boyd House, Walsh Street, South Yarra 1958. Architect: Robin Boyd. Why old is new again: The mid-century homes made famous by Don's Party and Dame Edna

From Robin Boyd to Barry Humphries, the connection between Australia’s mid-century modern houses and popular culture demonstrates their cultural and heritage value.

Opal Tower. Ministers fiddle while buildings crack and burn

Urgent action is needed to stop defective buildings being built, and building ministers should instructed the Australian Building Codes Board to dump its focus on …

Opal Tower. Bring back the Clerk of Works

In light of a number of prominent building failures in Australia, Michael Hegarty explores the role of the Clerk of Works, and the need to …

Most read

Latest on site