When the contemporary architect is requested to design something modern, they are faced with a contradiction: they seek something situated in the past. However, what does one mean by modern? The term “modern” is easily confused with its architectural stylistic equivalence, Modernism, as it is with its linguistic relative, modernity. The convergence of modern/Modernism/modernity becomes crystalline when considering that they all inherently reject “tradition” so as to be particularly “of their own time.” Therefore, in accepting modernity as the present period or in holding an appreciation of Modernist ideals or aesthetics, the architect is paradoxically working against the idea of what it is to be modern.
The Modernist safehouse
Marissa Looby and Michael Holt explore the inherent paradox in the idea of being modern: Is today’s concept of “newness” simply a mimicry of the past?
More discourseSee all
Australia is not equipped to deal with the climate crisis. Architects need to rediscover their collective voice and agency.
How do we build future cities that are sustainable, liveable and affordable in the age of the climate crisis?
Governments need to challenge the vested interests that argue against policies to deliver more diverse housing and seek to preserve Australians’ suburban way of life.
For people of faith, religious buildings are tangible places in which to contemplate a transcendent being. Ursula de Jong examines how universal ideas of divinity, …